Jul 26, 2009
"Why markets can't cure healthcare" by Paul Krugman
In short:
- Prices are either unpredictably cheap or expensive, which means insurance is the only realistic way for most people to pay for it.
- Insurance is incentivized to deny people care, which they do by refusing claims and not enrolling those with pre-existing conditions.
- But when insurance tries to cut costs responsibly - by discouraging ineffective treatments and so forth - they don’t have the trust from the public to do just that since we know about their incentive structure and regard every cost-cutting measure as morally cruel.
#1 means insurance is necessary, which walks us into the chicken-and-egg bind presented by #2 and #3. When it comes to cost-cutting in the current system, those covered by insurance perceive themselves to be bearing all the risk with promise of little reward in reduced premiums.
A public option would break this stalemate by combining the incentive and the costs into the same pool; any money saved in health-care would be returned to those the insurance covers, rather than a third-party stockholder. Additionally, by cutting costs it would provide precedent that private insurers could point to when instituting similar prudent cost-cutting measures within their own systems.
About
A side-project of Greg Brown. Try out a random post or view it on your phone.
You can subscribe via RSS.